- 级别
-
3
中级会员
|
The situation in the South China Sea in the latest
,air max soldes
time of China adverse ah! Over the years to countries around the South China Sea marine strategy continue to promote, Vietnam,tn requin pas cher, the Philippines and China has been a marked increase of the occupied islands and waters in the vicinity of the actual jurisdiction, the Philippines, Vietnam has been unable to suppress impulse and desire of the Nansha sea oil and gas resources development, without exception, the exploitation of oil and gas resources in the South China Sea as their best route out of poverty, why the Chinese do not move a mountain, who can give me a reason.
10 years ago China no exploitation of deep-sea oil,ggdb outlet. "
in the South China Sea, China for many years based on the overall situation awareness has always maintained self restraint. This is true in itself, but Chinese don't you go to take the lead in the development of others not to economic interests,chaussure golden goose, people will have a go it alone impulse,nikt tn pas cher, in patients, 2005 in the Philippines and Vietnam signed the "in the South China Sea Areas of agreement tripartite joint marine seismic work agreement. The agreement since 2008 after the expiration of the execution Philippines unilaterally with a British energy company reached an agreement continuously in the Nansha waters off the Liyue bank to carry out illegal activities in oil and gas exploration. I want to ask is why China does not propose joint development? Why don't you come up with how to develop the program? If you really don't want to Chinese, and these countries to develop, it alone is good,hogan outlet, but why you don't see any action?
< p > in the past, China in the South China Sea and the South China Sea countries to jointly develop not impossible,air max pas cher, originally China and the parties to the dispute can jointly set up a regional mutual funds, shares around the South China Sea joint development of the South China Sea oil and gas resources, the money you, China can shoulder the responsibility of the area, for the development of the region to make contribution more. When China and the South China Sea countries have also signed "shelving disputes and joint development agreement", but China do? No, why don't you do it? Puzzled, the central chess I really cannot read!
Others developed a < p > we protest, they don't develop nor developed in cooperation with others,le coq sportif pas cher, others to develop the and there is no way, did not dare to invade,golden goose deluxe brand, this is China's current predicament,scarpe hogan outlet, day let foreign people to go with his country hit saliva to battle, trouble does not bother you! Is there any sense? Or the use of force,sac goyard pas cher, or development, people really have been impatient!
< p > the problem now is that since Vietnam, the Philippines and other disputes relating to country do not want to "joint development", then at the present time, China should take the initiative to develop, so as to maintain the controversy, to maintain and promote cooperation. Why not Chinese active development of the South China Sea? Under the central chess I really cannot read, is not in the South China Sea issue Chinese there is no one to senior management?
< p > a discerning eye to see that, China in disputed waters in the development in the later, the influence, the weaker, right to speak on the smaller, future in Nansha rights costs will be higher, more western national oil companies have been involved in the company, the greater the possibility that Western powers involved in, Vietnam and the Philippines over the years are in positive with the Western powers of the oil companies to develop,zapatillas new balance outlet, erect well have thousands of, and China's oil has not, China still etc. What, let a person do not understand?
Related topics:
Photo the
Siqin Gaow
The situat
the labor cooperation under the dispatch of the people. 11 at the end of all kinds of labor service personnel. As of the end of 11 this year, I sent a total of foreign labor service cooperation business 6 million 830 thousand people. |
|